LivingMetal said:
Kasz216 said:
LivingMetal said:
Kasz216 said:
LivingMetal said:
fordy said:
LivingMetal said:
Again:
"The truth that has been pointed out over and over again which has been denied by everyone unreasonable is that we all know that what geohot released WILL be abused. AND he PROVED his malicious intent by the release and content of that rap video. Keep lying to yourself. You guys aren't gamers."
|
Yet you're supporting Sony wasting their money on a case just to prove a point, when that money could be going towards PROPER protection devices for the online community?
It's blatantly ignorant to think that the one-trick pony of a protection system that was flawed to begin with would meet the needs of PS3 security this entire time. They need to cut their losses and work to prevent even more damage being done.
|
I'm not supporting Sony. I'm supporting the enjoyment of gaming.
|
Er... then why are you argueing for Sony...
|
I just said I wasn't specifically supporting Sony in this situation. So I'm not arguing for Sony. I'm supporting the enjoyment of gaming. Do I need to repeat myself, or are you just trying to discredit me because I made a valid point you could not successfully argue?
|
You are argueing against the side supporting the enjoyment of gaming. You are argueing for the side that allows restrictions on your gaming console preventing you from fully enjoying said gaming.
You know what will happen to hackers in COD? IP bans. Or it would if Activision cared.
|
I buy a game for what it is unless the developer wants to improve in some way via update. If I don't think I'll like the game, I don't but it. if I find I don't like the game after I bought it, my mistake. If I bought something I don't like software or hardware, I get rid of it. My right, my choice. No restriction, Just part of the world of gaming like life itself.
|
Guess it was your mistake then for buying COD and the PS3 which apparently was so eaisly hackable.
