Ail said:
Ah ah can't argue your way with facts so just gonna try to bully it ? Music revenue were twice as big before pirates started appear but still you're clinging to that crazy idea that they had no effect on the decline of revenue... You know that it only takes 30 seconds to research your argument instead of bringing random things that turn out to be false. In other words we're going to cut your income by 50% over the next 10 years but don't worry, you were in a bubble so no big deal........ |
"Before piracy appeared"... when was that exactly? Music "piracy" has existed since blank cassettes.
Aside from which, do you know what a bubble is?
Without piracy the bubble would of shrunk income to 50% or less anyway.
You know, pricefixing lawsuit lost? MP3's allowing people to buy singles?
Actual sales are up, revenue is down.
You may as well blame the housing bubble burst on people squatting in abandoned buildings.
People aren't buying less.
They are buying smarter and cheaper.
Of course, we've gone off the topic of the government reports in which you had no answer.
Because you essentially know your wrong but don't want to admit it.
Either publically or to yourself, I can't say which.
Personally, I'm going to stick with prevailing scientific theory.
You can keep ignoring it at your leisure, however i'm going to start ignoring you, since your waaay to invested in this and don't want an actual resonable discussion, and instead wish to rant, cling to silly disproven arguements with questionable correlation inoring actual proven confounding variables and ignoring the statistics as provided.
Your worse than a poltician with your attempts at spin.
