sapphi_snake said:
Kasz216 said:
sapphi_snake said:
Kasz216 said:
Er... you were the one who wanted to kill someone by taking Justice in your own hands weren't you.
From the persepective of someone who is Pro-life, an abortion doctor is MANY MANY times worse then those two people you wanted to kill.
I mean think about it. If you believe a Fetus is a baby... we are talking about people who kill multiple babies a month.
Now, for someone like you who thinks you need to take justice in your own hands some times... what would you do if you lived in the same area as someone who killed multiple babies a month?
Considering how enraged you were about those two people in england... I could only imagine said person would be dead this instant if you believed a fetus was a child.
|
Shush you. Don't you use what I said in the past to discredit me.  I was angry and irrational back then (though I still don't agree with the "rehabilitation" that was used in that situation).
Anyways, it still is pretty ironic that someone who calls himself "pro life" would have such little respect for life (or maybe their respect for life ends after a person is born, after which everyone's fair game to be killed).
Christians are also not supposed to be violent, but then again you can only judge a religion based on the actions of it's followers (their actions done in the name of that religion).
|
It's ironic to be pro-life and to kill 1 person to save dozens? I don't really see Irony in that... as by killing one person you would be saving dozens. I mean, aboritions in the eyes of a pro-life person probably has to be worse then the holocaust, because more "people" are killed and worst of all, they're all children.
|
Yes. it s ironic for someone who considers himself "pro-life" to want to kill anyone, regardless of the reasons. It's called being inconsistent. Also, just because pro-life people think fetuses are people (children), doesn't make it true.
|
No it's not. It's not inconsistant in the least. Being pro life means your for life. In taking one life to perserve many more others, and more importantly completely innocent others... is very consistant.
As for pro-life people thinking fetuses are children doesn't make it true... that's.
A) Irrelevent.
B) It doesn't make it ture that they aren't either. There is no actual big "Scientific" proof otherwise.
I mean, assuming you don't think fetuses are children. Which i'd guess by the way you put that.
When are they children? At what point does an unborn thing become a person, and why. What metric are you using to judge that.
