By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
radiantshadow92 on 20 February 2011
Edit Thread
AussieGecko said:
radiantshadow92 said:

Any 360 owner who says they wouldn't want trophies is just kidding themselves. Sony implemmented trophies AFTER the achievment system was made and they made it BETTER. They do EVERYTHING achievement do, and add on it. And i am not just saying this because i don't own a 360. I will be the first one to admit that Nintendo has the best system (if and when they immplement it) because i am sure they will make it better than Sony's. Either way, both get the job done.


my opinion > anybody elses opinion

This is simply opinion based, no one is kidding themselves either way. XBL was before PSN but somehow its still worth getting paid for. Just because it comes after doesnt necessarily mean its better. <- that actually counters most of your argument.

The second thing is that you can tell them different... you can compare achievements/ratios. If you played very easy games to get platinums it is no different to high gamerscore. Both have got advantages. I like gamerscore because some achievements are actually worth 1gs not 10 or not worth a bronze trophy.

Thus achievements for mine, trophies for you.


Its not an opinion, its a fact. Trophies are better than achievments like XBLA is better than PSN. Its the truth. I never said that it was purely because it was immplemented second. However, trophies still do EVERYTHING achievments do minus the pop-up sound. However, achievments don't give incentive towards actually 100 percenting the game, and they don't show a level that could easily distinguish the MEN from the boys. It feels good to level up, and i am sure there are plenty of people who would agree with that. Like i said though, its no big deal, Just like PSN and XBLA, they both get the job done well.