Rath said:
I'm not saying that America was anti-democracy. They just wanted slowly introduced democracy under a stable dictatorship. America was pro-reform, but they were anti-revolution. The American government at the start of the protests were calling for Mubarak to implement the reforms, not for him to stand down. Even late in the piece they were very tepid on the idea, and never called for it directly. |
Publically. However if you really following the story you'd know that privately they were suggesting a handover to the military as soon as the whole thing started and DID want him to step down. The rumors for the US plan to transition to democracy in Januray the day after the protests started ended up being EXACT plan that was used.
Things went exactly to US and Obama's plans. They just weren't widely expressed plans.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/thereporters/markmardell/2011/01/obamas_behind-the-scenes_effor.html
The US didn't much care how it happnened. They just weren't expecting people to protest angrily to have a transition like that. Really you need to have a deeper and more thoughtful look to understand foreign policy now a days.








