By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Sheeplord said:
Kasz216 said:

[Cut]


The problem with Libya is that it JUST recently entered the international community, actually due to the strongarm tactics of the Bush administration along with others factors.  There is no way for the international community to intervene... they are fully willing to use full force and to go back in on themselves.  They'll end up like the protestors in Iran.

[Cut]

Yemen... despite having little Western ties... was fragile before this started... and there are already some violent opposition groups... but even if they succeed... it probably would only lead to another dictator.

Firstly, I will say (although it's perhaps the only reddeming feature of the his admin.), Bush did try to have a mission to spread democracy set up in the area, it justwasn't done well and never got funding.

As to the second bit I've copied, that is the problem. Revolution tends to swap one form of corruption for another. It's a whole lot of blood and a whole lot of killing for nothing. Hopefully, they'll get somewhere but it looks like the government isn't after a peaceful transition like Egypt - the kind which does get somewhere.

It's why I think, despite the opposite of what it seems... that working with dictators is the best way to overthrow them.

The Egyptian Military wanted a peaceful transition because they saw themselves more as the protector of Egypt then working for their "President".

Unlike the rest of the armed forces in Egypt... why did they have this difference in opinion?   Well look who trained them.  With the right mindset and enough outside support you know a democracy will follow.