| richardhutnik said: And then there was the study who showed those who watched Fox News were least likely to get the facts right: http://news.slashdot.org/story/10/12/16/1615218/Survey-Shows-That-Fox-News-Makes-You-Less-Informed?from=rss It was also found to be the most biased: http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=137 Next up, showing how other networks are just as bad. Shoot, might as well justify what Fox News bungles by say, "nah nah, others do the same. nah nah nah!" In short, a variation on this a comment found at the bottom of this article: http://gawker.com/#!5411282/fox-news-to-go-error free-in-2010 I hear they're just going to hire some ********* old man to scream "both sides do it" at the camera every time some Republican gets caught in a lie.
|
Actually you should take a look at those studies. At least one of them was specifically flawed or designed specifically to get the result it did.
Read the Questionaire
http://www.worldpublicopinion.org/pipa/pdf/dec10/Misinformation_Dec10_quaire.pdf
If you can't figure out based on the questions why it got the result it did... I don't know what to say.
Never heard of "FAIR" I find it funny though that they are comparing guest lists with CNN yet seem to have avoided using HLN and MSNBC. Based on it's ridiculious headlines though.... I wouldn't give it much credit.
I mean, one of their headlines is "NYT Nails Donald Rumsefeld!"... by asking him if it bothers him that some people call him a war criminal. I wouldn't exactly trust a site that giggles at somemone asking rumsfeld what he thinks about the people who call him a war criminal.
If your trying to make a point... it would be helpful to not site extremly biased sources that kinda help disprove your point.
