thranx said:
MARCUSDJACKSON said:
Rath said:
MARCUSDJACKSON said:
Rath said:
MARCUSDJACKSON said:
Rath said:
That's not how copyright works...
|
we are going to start repeating our selves Rath, and while we were heading in an upward debate its now going in circles.
great debate but it ends here.
|
It wasn't a great debate. It wasn't even a debate. You were claiming it was illegal under copyright with no understanding of how copyright works or why it wasn't illegal under copyright laws.
|
really! thats how you want to end this?
you have no class at all
if not a debate then we had nothing to talk about in the first place, and wht you said means notthing and furthermore why did you quote me. you should've left me alone and quoted someone else to talk about nothing with.
i got into the conversation to learn something (been stuck in finance to long), but you sir have tought me nothing, and don't bother
|
I wasn't talking about nothing. I was pointing out that at no point was what he did breaking copyright. You kept avoiding this simple point.
|
ok , but he did break his user agreement.
|
Which is perfectly legal. T.o.S and E.U.L.A are only as good as they are written, and you can not contract yourself out of your rights.
|
i'm going to post like hell so i don't have to see this thread anymore.
the whole debate, conversation, or wht ever rath or you want to call it was just plain stupid anyway. if you support it fine, but i don't and won't.
