By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Wagram on 16 February 2011
Edit Thread
nightsurge said:
Wagram said:
nightsurge said:
Wagram said:
BHR-3 said:

alot of things arent as big on here as they were before i dont think its just KZ3

other reasons could be KZ2s lack of popularty after release i mean it wasnt a sales monster not even close and KZ3s meta


Review scores don't matter. They are over run by money hungry fanboys. Play the game, decide for yourself. That will determine if it is AAA.

Lol what?! That's some messed up logic. So you think people are paid to give games a bad score?  Wow... and here I thought the usual excuse was companies were bribed to give good scores, not bad...


Honestly. Yes I do. Money can make people do anything.

But who would pay them to do that? That's just completely stupid and illogical. Pay them to give a good score, yes, but to give a bad score? Nahhh, that's even more conspiracy theory than the paying to give good scores excuse.

People all have their own opinions. Killzone 2 received inflated review scores because of the graphical prowess and attention it had at the time, imo, which isn't the case with Killzone 3.  I still loved KZ2 and will be buying KZ3 at midnight next Monday and can't wait, and it's not like an 86 is a bad score, either!!!


86 is not a bad score by any means but you can't tell me that KZ3 didn't get hit by a double standard. KZ3s story is apparently so important that it gets trashed while MW2/ Black Ops story gets a free pass? Come on something isn't right here.