Wagram said:
nightsurge said:
Wagram said:
BHR-3 said:
alot of things arent as big on here as they were before i dont think its just KZ3
other reasons could be KZ2s lack of popularty after release i mean it wasnt a sales monster not even close and KZ3s meta 
|
Review scores don't matter. They are over run by money hungry fanboys. Play the game, decide for yourself. That will determine if it is AAA.
|
Lol what?! That's some messed up logic. So you think people are paid to give games a bad score? Wow... and here I thought the usual excuse was companies were bribed to give good scores, not bad...
|
Honestly. Yes I do. Money can make people do anything.
|
But who would pay them to do that? That's just completely stupid and illogical. Pay them to give a good score, yes, but to give a bad score? Nahhh, that's even more conspiracy theory than the paying to give good scores excuse.
People all have their own opinions. Killzone 2 received inflated review scores because of the graphical prowess and attention it had at the time, imo, which isn't the case with Killzone 3. I still loved KZ2 and will be buying KZ3 at midnight next Monday and can't wait, and it's not like an 86 is a bad score, either!!!
