fordy said:
Edgeoflife said:
fordy said:
Edgeoflife said:
fordy said:
Edgeoflife said:
fordy said:
Edgeoflife said:
Sony's whole thing is quality products, they make profit off that
|
And no other company doesn't take quality into consideration?
Need I recall the need to flip hot PS1s upside down to get them to read discs? The PS2 wasn't exactly reliable either in terms of prolonged use...
All of them have their quality issues.
|
I didn't say that I didn't even imply that, I might have implied MS doesn't but thats about it, and they may of had some quality issues but it was always within industry standards unlike the 360
|
And they're both terrible when compared to Nintendo. Sony shattered quality issue records as soon as they came into the gaming industry, so I wouldn't go talking about quality if I were you.
|
I'm not convinced of that, and they were always within electronic standards unlike MS
|
10% is an embarassment for a company that specialises in ELECTRONICS...
http://au.gamespot.com/news/6216691.html
|
if 10% is an embarsement, whats 68%?
|
Fabrication.
Besides, I'm not talking about Microsoft here. I didn't question their integrity as a maker of electronics, but as soon as you start to spout that Sony has quality hardware, you should prepared to defend it by itself and not against others.
PS2 also would break with a stiff wind....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y46f76Bpneo&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sVRJtqPRZhQ
|
10% isn't an embaresment it's well within industry standards especially with cutting edge technology, and the 68% wasn't fabrication, the within industry standards MS spouted several times and the numbers they produced to the public was the fabrication
