Dno said:
Gnizmo said:
DMeisterJ said:
@ NJ5
Oh, that makes sense. But since you can swap hard drives, or use an external one to save, when I get mine, I'm gonna use a 500GB external one I had for my comp that my dad bought me but I hardly use to store downloads if need be, and I am gonna upgrade it to 250GB internally (Didn't a company come out with like a 350 or 400 gb 2.5" one recently? I think I remember reading it somewhere, maybe at CES?) |
You seriously think that is a good solution? Don't get me wrong, I hardly think this is a major problem but buying a new hard drive is more than a little too expensive to keep playing your old games. If you are going to sell a console as a game platform, it should come with enough hardware to play a lot of games. Requiring an instal is added aggravation for people like me who randomly want to play a game for 5 minutes every few months. It really should be optional. |
yet microsoft comes out with an elite and a 179 dollar HD and no one complains. and you can get a 250 gig HD for ps3 for less then 150. i am TOTALY down for downloading ALL my games to the HD so i can have a better play time. xbox loads like crazy just because it does not use the HD. GO capcom!! |
In what world did no one complain about that? The stupid proprietary hard drive the 360 uses has been a source of thousands, if not millions of complaints. And how exactly do you know how often the 360 version of DMC4 loads? Oh that is right, you are just spewing fanboy nonsense.
Uh, did she mention Wii? How can your implied reading of what she said indicate that SHE is biased?
If you spend 3 minutes on the forums you know GGE is the worst Wii troll on here. It is easily safe to assume that if she is criticising something that it is because the Wii does it differently. It is also blatantly obvious she is just hating the idea because the PS3 is the first to do it. Installing games as a concept is almost as old as the industry itself.
