By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
NotStan said:

 

Edgeoflife said:
NotStan said:
[..]

How do you know that? Do you have internal sources? Cough them up, all I see is EDD division having it's best quarter ever, if you imply that MS should have already covered the cost of R&D and advertising in a space of 4 months I dread to think of your attitude towards most games that tend to justify their development over several months into their life cycle.

Fact is, EDD is profitable(By quite a margin btw), so whichever way you spin it, Kinect probably moved substantial amount of HW besides the stand alone unit itself. Btw, 8,000,000*~$100 = alot of f**king money.

last time I checked they were only making 50 on it per sale and half a billion on advertising is alot a hell of a lot of money and again this is off topic, the topic is about hte capabilities of kinect not the sales 

Hey I am not the one that started the whole sales thingy majig here, "MS is probably still in the red with Kinect because of advertising". Just had to disprove a statement or two made by you.

In terms of capabilities, if Sony could have made this kind of tech it would have. If you honestly believe that Sony would applaud it's competitor on launching a succesful product and not in anyway, trying to undermine it, you're dead wrong. I don't have Kinect personally so I can't comment on the capabilities or the scope that it provides, but the fact of the matter is, you're arguing about something completely pointless without any relative sources to back your "facts" up.

 

You didn't read the full article did you (not the one on the first post but it was a few posts down, destrutoid just picked out parts)? Sony was looking at 3D cameras before MS was thats a fact denying it is just ignorant