Also to give an example of the state of mind some gaming journalists are in these days. A few weeks back a writer for this site commented in a thread that compared Killzone 2 against Crysis 2. Now little had been shown on the PC version of Crysis 2 and he didn't play KZ3 or Crysis 2 PC yet either but according to him Crysis 2 PC shitted all over Killzone 3. Is he right? Most likely yes but as a gaming journalist shouldn't he have at least kept an open mind about it until he seen more of both games .
If he was asked to review KZ3 would he have gone into the review with a state of mind like that. KZ3 its a good game but Crysis 2 shits all over it. I mean he said he leaves all that out when hes working but people are hugh liers. What he says and what he does could be too differant things.
