osamanobama said:
Oblivion86 said:
osamanobama said:
|
Kinect sucess is due to marketing and consumer perception almost exclusively, after the holidays it had a huge drop in sales, and I think it will continue dropping the longer it is out
|
but its still selling like crazy, and kinect advantures is always top 3 sold per week (its already sold more than 8 million, thats insane, sports champions will be luck to get that lifetime) also kinect is more expensive and the games cost more.
and its pretty limited iin the types of games and genres it can do
|
http://gamrreview.vgchartz.com/sales/45608/kinect-adventures/
look at the graph, the second the holidays were over the thing dropped in sales massively and the sales continue to drop, and frankly I don't see them ever getting the sales anywhere near to where they were even with a price drop
|
it still sells a ton.
gosh dangit, whats up with Americans (i am american) flocking to kinect and xbox 360 for that matter and buying it in droves, but not Move and ps3. i dont get it, its agravating
|
I'm sorry but stop trolling, take your bullshit opinions and leave. Move is a technical flop that blatantly and deliberately copies dated technology, those figures presented are entirely skewed. It is already stated that Kinect's RGB and Depth cameras are capable of 640x480 @ 60 FPS. Also, the PS eye is running off of only one camera and cannot track depth or head-tracking, all it can do is follow an IR sensor just like the Wii. So please once again take your skewed facts and GTFO.
Also to Edge, then why is it still the top selling peripheral and why the hell is 360 consistently out-selling PS3 almost every week since June of last year, go ahead and try to answer I'll wait.
|
why are you quoting me, i havent posted any facts, trying to make kinect look bad. i dont think any one doubts that kinect is a better body tracker than the ps eye. also where did you get that kinect is 640x480 @ 60fps. its always been reported 320 x 240 @ 30 FPS. the bolded is a lie, move has always been able to do head tracking (it does it in this little game called GT5) and did you not reaf the OP and story at all. he said the eye can do depth through algarithems, but kinect gets it for free. also how is move based on old tech and is copying. from every major reviewer (also digital foundry and modern science) say it the most advanced and accurate motion tech.
also
 
 
2003 2010
|
Go read the latest reports on what Kinect is capable of, I'm done arguing with people who only know half the story. On PCs it has already been proven that both cameras can run at 640x480 @ 60 fps.
