heruamon said:
Chairman-Mao said:
heruamon said:
Chairman-Mao said:
jarrod said:
Chairman-Mao said:
Unless MS is paying them to keep it exclusive then there is no good reason to keep it just on 360. 3rd party exclusives don't make any sense to me.
|
Microsoft's already likely done the "payment". I'd agree though, 3rd party exclusives only really make sense when they're being subsidized by the hardware maker... which Gears 1-3 undoubtedly were.
|
Agreed, They definitely paid for Gears to be exclusive.
|
Some people call it "payments" when M$ does it, and "developmental partnerships" when other console makers do it...
|
lol developmental partnership just sounds weird. I'm not trying to knock MS here, it was a smart move getting Gears to be exclusive.
|
How would you describe the Resistance franchise, for example ofcourse...
|
I would describe it as awesome. Resistance 2 took a step back from Fall of Man but Resistance 3 is looking to be fantastic. :)
