M.U.G.E.N said:
Mr.Metralha said:
aavidbacon said:
Mr.Metralha said:
Funny how people didn't bother with the statistical tie talk when the Wii was on top =)
After 4 years, people still need to label 1st, 2nd and 3rd, like that is gonna change who's the market leader this gen.
|
It´s because when a console is 100k in front, at least, is just silly talk...
|
So, which console is 100K in front this week?
|
you're missing the point he is making. If a console is having a lead of like 100k (actually even around 20k should be enough imo) it's not a statistical tie. Hence when wii had such a lead over HD consoles, no need to bring in that term into a discussion at all, wii had clearly won. So it was a good thing, why you're so worked up over it I don't understand
|
I think his original point is being missed. I think what he was saying initially was that no one gave a shit about there being a statistical tie for second place. At least that's how I interpreted it.