chocoloco said:
There is fault in my arguement if your looking at from the perspective of a person who actually wants to play kinect. I'm writing from a bias of someone who will not buy anything that works with kinect alone. I report my own biases and cannot predict what others will enjoy or appreciate. So with or without kinect it is new, some will be happy because it is new because they like or want kinect. The other group will look at it as Microsoft giving them nothing because they have no interest in kinect. So if something works only with kinect it must interest me alone to make it worthwhile in my eyes. I am just hoping microsoft is able to please everyone by making kinect games that also function with the traditional 360 control system. |
No you seem to be of the point of view that for example a square is a circle if all parameters are set that way.
You want your logic to work... the issue is that it doesnt matter if you dont want it 8million and growing have kinect and that is from a very short time, it will grow.
You are not letting Gears count for some reason. You are saying from the start... errr wouldnt all "timed" or "full" exclusives start with the 360. You are simply discounting games that don't work for your point.
You want to please everyone but the issue with your argument is that a lot of people are buying 360 purely for Kinect and for that basis they would have to count in this situation.
And you are saying MS published. A Ms published game went multiplat simply by changing the name of Ninja Gaiden and then adding Sigma.








