Sony's latest [failed] anti-piracy tactic

[whatever]

fps_d0minat0r said:

Acevil said:

fps_d0minat0r said:

so the judge is protecting hackers and in effect stopping sony from annoying them in their work.

lets say this was to do with drugs, would the judge stop the police from searching for them? NO, so why when it comes to cyber criminals they are given a wall of protection?

the judge should be sued.....if you can do that?

Two problems with your statement. 1. You are comparing people who were commenting in a videos to drug DEALERS not drug users. 

2. Judges do stop police from searching individuals, if the judge finds the claim to have no reasonable ground, and JUDGE WOULD NEVER SIGN OFF ON DRUG USERS (On that basis alone).

2 problems with your reply

1) your assuming sony will ban everyone whos details they obtain

2) it was just an example of another crime situation, when police look for drug dealers they come across innocent people too, they dont lock them up do they?

funny how everyone thinks sony will gather 'personal' data and name and shame them on playstation blog or sell it to 3rd party companies. they should have done it undercover like google, screwed up the hackers and then someone would have found out 3 years later when the ps3 would be safe from harm and no-one would be complaining.

A judge is supposed to give out people's personal information because a company asked for it, even if no crime has been committed?  WTF is wrong with you?