Badassbab said:
disolitude said:
If anyone thinks 1080p makes a huge difference, they are kidding themselves. If I see a game chugging on desired settings at 1080p on my pc, the first thing I do is lower the resolution. Give me lots of AA @ 720p rather than 1080p with no AA any day.
Does anyone know what this game runs at in 3D? 720p/2 per eye?
|
Gotta disagree there. Native 1080p with max settings looks noticeably better than 720p with max settings on and my PC monitor is 23inches i.e not that big. Plus the viewing area is much improved. Motion blur helps to mask lowish frame rates (as in 25-30fps which is low by PC standards). You do need a pretty decent PC though to play max settings @ 1920 x 1080p though but contrary to what many think it doesn't cost an arm and a leg but acknowledge it's a lot more than consoles and not as user friendly for games. Apart from strategy games I just prefer playing games on consoles as it's hooked up to my surround sound and on a bigger TV I can sit on my sofa. I know I can do that with a PC but it's more of a hassle due to needing the keyboard and mouse and it takes a lot of room.
|
Native 1080p with 8X AA does look better than 720p and 8XAA. I think one would have to be pretty thick to try to argue that... However 720p with lots of AA looks better than 1080p and no AA. Usually thats the choice one has to make for PC gaming (1080p or anti aliasing)
Otherwise, I am running overclocked GTx470s in SLI so I can max out any game at 1080p...however I'm gaming at 5760x1080 using 3 monitors in 2D surround vision...and at that res, I do run in to issues with some games. I find that lowering all 3 monitors to 720p and keeping the AA up looks much better than disabling AA and having 1080p accross the baord. I hate jaggies!!!
