Why Reach is Better than Black Ops

[NotStan]

Tony_Stark said:

Reach said:

More Skill Gap , Much more Fun , More Competitive , LagLess , Badass Ranks , Commendations and Daily Challenges.

Black Ops is a GREAT Game but hasnt the awesome conections that Halo Reach has... Black Ops suffers from some LAG not much. Black Ops is much easier to play and the game is FULL of BS , its much better than Mw2 but Bungie once again delivers the best Multiplayer of the year.

Reach is the best online game. Period.

How about no.

There is no skill gap in Reach, Noobs are rewarded with the melee, armor lock, shotgun, and needler. It's become more about luck than skill.

It's no fun being destroyed by noobs, skilled people I don't mind at all, but noobs, that just pisses me off.

It's got plenty of lag.

The ranking system is worthless since it just rewards people who have no life, and is not indicative of skill level.

the challenges are a stroke of geniouse though.

I haven't plaid black ops yet, so  Iwon't comment on it, but suffice to say, Bungie has shit on their franchise by making it more COD-like than the latest COD game (from what I hear black ops is less noob friendly than it's predicessors, and less noob friendly that Reach).

Mind you, this is coming from a guy who is a Halo FREAK, and almost exclusively plays REACH, Halo 3 was better in that it wasn't as noob friendly, I do like some of the armor abilities, and I LOVE the DMR, but I wish it had lead-on like the BR did.

Black Ops is really not noob friendly, I am veteran of the COD series and had trouble maintaining 1 KDR throughout the first several games up until I got better guns, around level 14 when I unlocked Famas and level 17 when I unlocked AK 74-u, after that it's reasonably easy to maintain 1-1.5 KDR but considerably more harder to get higher killstreaks than on MW2, I am talking like Blackbird, Chopper gunner and Dogs. I was somewhere along the lines of 45-18 and never had a single killstreak because I was on 8,9,11. Pretty good challenge imho.