By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
pezus said:
osamanobama said:

is anyone else shocked at how poorly done the ign.com review was. 1st off it was only one freakin page, some addon get longer reviews than that. and it seems as though they didnt spend much time playing it (specifically with move and 3D)

" Move controls are functional but in no way superior or better than an analog controller, while 3D is...well…3D. Yay?"

did they even play the game in 3D. thanks ign you told us a game that says 3d game on the cover is in 3d. so how good is it. did you experiment with the move, hell did you use the sharpshooter, did the shapshooter help. god, i hate ign. play the game in its entirety then review it.

also whats with giving games like this and GOW3 9.5 on graphics, what games look better than this

edit: now the review shows up on 2 pages, but its really 1.5 pages. weird

I thought the same about the IGN review. IGN has really been disappointing me as of late, their reviews are just not up to par.

Bolded: Yep and funnily enough, IGN gave MW2 on the PS3 a 10 in graphics. I mean wth?? MW2 in no way looks better than Killzone 3.

WTF

Some people and sites should not have the right to review games! WHAT THE FUCK !!!!!!