MARCUSDJACKSON on 02 February 2011
Kasz216 said:
MARCUSDJACKSON said:
Kasz216 said:
MARCUSDJACKSON said:
Rath said:
MARCUSDJACKSON said:
kitler53 said:
Kasz216 said:
You think they're the same people? You do realize that hackers don't actual gain ANY benefits from the hacking they do right? Outside being able to apply the same hacks to their products?
This hack by the way... doesn't even allow piracy.
"breaking into anything is wrong". I thought you were a democrat? Your strange Neo-conservative view here is weird.
Should it be illegal to break into your own house? Afterall that's what he was breaking into... his own PS3.
If someone gave everybody the keys to break into their own house... should it be illegal?
|
no see, this is where are wrong. when you buy a ps3 you by the hardware NOT the software. if geohotz wants to bedazzled his ps3 -- go right ahead. but you, i, or geohot do not own the software on the ps3, that's not part of the deal.
i own a copy of windows -- what i don't own is the right to modify and redistribute the code because i don't own it. if i wanted to do that i'd have to pony up the 8 or whatever BILLION dollars it would cost to buy those rights.
|
it really begs the question does anybody know wht copyright infringement is or means?
and if they did we would still be having this conversation.
i know everybody here knows wht it means but when it comes to hacking some people throw laws out the window.
|
Did he break copyright though? I do know what copyright is and that code is protected by it, but he hasn't published any code as such has he?
|
clever! found a hole in my argument did we. thats reall good and it was an obvious hole, but the fact that others can find this code out is the problem which will create the situation for copyright violation, piracy and more.
and just because he didn't doesn't mean others can't use his technology to do so. as well all know and can tell nothing is hack proof and neither is jail brake.
|
Which is completely irrelvent. "someone else could do something bad with it!" is pointless.
Once again, that's the same reasoning that has people sue gun companies for shooting deaths.
|
well thats stupid, but you have no rights to the sofeware nor the ability to brake into hardwar
|
A court of law would and HAS disagreed with you. You do have the right to hack the software under Fair Use to get the software out of the way of using the hardware how you want.
Again you are being COMPLETELY illogical and intellectually dishonest.
|
can't be dishonest with my self can i? well i can but i stand by wht i say, and i'm sure another court would disagree with that court.
