Final-Fan said:
1. See my posts above regarding the VAT in Europe. It's not nearly as big as the FairTax would be, but it's the best example I know of of large sales tax implementation. And keep in mind that, again, VATs are to the best of my knowledge more tax-evasion-resistant than a retail sales tax. |
Alright I have come across someone who has answered these questions, excellently if I may add. Here are the sources. http://www.fairtaxblog.com/20050828/evasion-potential-with-the-fairtax-vs-the-vat-tax/ and http://www.fairtaxblog.com/20050824/evasion-potential-of-the-fairtax/.
Both are articles and responses to a FairTax critic. He makes completely valid and rational arguments. He says that the VAT is not any more enforceable than the FairTax is. The FairTax requires all businesses to file sales to the "Sales Tax Authority" just as the VAT does. When conducting a Business to Business transaction, the selling business would need to have the buyer's tax exemption form on file, and if they do not have it on file, they would be required to tax them. The buyer would then claim a refund with the "STA."
Any experience with history of a NST lacks the current technology and tracking ability we currently have. Software that we have or can have is or will be extremely robust in ability to track statistics and patterns. If businesses start to claim unusual damaged or stolen goods numbers from the normal industry, we can flag them to be checked. The software could have extra routines that can be run to check for collusion between two businesses or between a business and an individual. If online poker sites can check for things like this, then why can't the "STA"?
His two articles answer a nagging question that I haven't been able to answer. Read them for yourself. The two above paragraphs are a very brief synopsys of the answer to this evasion question.








