By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
geddesmond2 on 31 January 2011
Edit Thread
ssj12 said:
geddesmond2 said:

Crisis 2 looks photo realistic while KZ2 looks great and has dust blowing around and it has a sense of atmosphire. Thats why I think KZ2 is the better looking game. Theres more going on in KZ2 and it has better kill animations and blood splatters.

KZ3 is gonna blow Crisis 2 out of the water


Realism is the name of the game. Even Killzone is trying to create a realistic fictional world. Its a matter of how realistic the devs can make the games.

And I doubt it, Crysis and Crysis: Warhead were amazing games better then Killzone 2. It won't compare to Crysis 2 in anyway. It will still be fun though, I'll get it eventually.

Still even Crysis 2 is going to suck compared to an extremely well done shooters like Battlefield 3 and Half-Life 2: Episode 3. And the next Unreal Tournament will be just as good too.


Well I'm not saying KZ2 does look better than Crisis 2 but what I am saying is that "I think it looks better in my opinion". To my preferance I like how KZ2 has atmosphire and it shows you this unstable planet with dust blowing everywhere and lightning in the stormy skies and shit. While other people will think Crisis 2 looks better because its photo realistic and thats there opinion.

Also I'm not talking about the PC versions of crisis 2. I know how Crisis 1 and Warhead looked but you really can't compare consols to PCs. Thats like bringing a gun into a knife fight.  As far as consols go KZ3 is looking photo realistic and it comes with all the dust blowing and smoke everywhere. I havn't seen both games up close on my HDTV yet but from the videos posted online KZ3 is looking like the better game right now.