dahuman said:
ElGranCabeza said:
dahuman said:
ElGranCabeza said:
dahuman said:
Let me make this thread a conclusion, Epic can do whatever the hell they want with Gears of War, but it's most likely an IP that shows "we like you" to MS, it's probably more a business decision based on both parties.
ElGran, it's OK to be wrong, just man up. You don't need to know everything in the world nor can you control what common definitions mean as a single person, it's not a big fucking deal. Learn from it instead.
|
But....I'm not wrong
@MarkRein Mark Rein
@xXTrbekXx @therealcliffyb it means NGP, by virtue of its dual analog sticks, is suited to games like Gears but Gears itself is only on 360
|
Yes you are, they are saying that Gears is only on 360 but you are arguing that MS has control over where Gears goes, which is what you have been posting all over the place and that part is not true. It's just a business decision.
|
"Business" decision that involves consulting MS, a partner that owns parts of the rights to the franchise on where the franchise can and cannot go.
|
No, MS has zero right on doing that, as far as the law goes, Epic can easily find another publisher, like EA, and do the same thing Bioware did with Mass Effect 2 onwards. MS doesn't own shit besides the publishing right to Gears 1 and 2. So you are wrong no matter how you try to spin it, and people have already proved you wrong on that topic multiple times. You obviously don't know much when it comes to basic laws.
|
So you know more than Mark Rein? Read my post above.
