By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Kasz216 said:
kitler53 said:
MARCUSDJACKSON said:
kitler53 said:
NiKKoM said:

You know what would suck? If he used his daddy's PC to hack it.. :D

anyway glad I don't live in california cause apparently, buying a piece of hardware for $300 does not mean you own it and can do what you like with it, under California Law... >_>


true story -- i made a copy of your house key.  it's only a copy so it's not stealing and thus completely legal.  being the the freedom fighter i am i distributed that key to everyone in your neighboorhood.  how was i suppose to know that the guy who has been sent to jail 3 times already would use that key to break into your house, steal your shit, and rape your wife.  i mean, as i handed out the keys i told him not do that so i am of course completely blameless.

really, when you think about it this hole thing is your fault.  you should have known i was going to try and make copies of your household protection mechanisms.  you really should have had a more secure house.  i hope you learned your lesson.


best post ever.

 

...it seems to be quite popular with the anti-hacker crowd but i keep coming back to this thread to see if any of the pro-hacker crowd are going to respond.  looks like they will not be doing that...

Probably because it's a poor strawman arguement.  You are equating actual loss of items, with zero loss of property.

with the loss of billions of dollars in revenue. maybe the big tech companies should go out of business then hackers can go back to robbing banks and stilling identities, working for the mob.(ok a little far out there but you get the point).

the IP'S of these talented devlopers is property, and thats wht this hack constitutes and we all know it.

breaking into anything is wrong and should not be done.