AussieGecko on 22 January 2011
| Kantor said: Kinect is more realistic. I suppose it could be argued that pure motion control is more feasible. However, it's certainly not more practical, and it just seems to me as though they're shoving motion control where it's not going to fit. Would you want to drive your car by blinking? Of course, only time will tell. |
100 percent in agreeance. With Table tennis I got used to hitting nothing with my invisible bat, but bowling is still weird for me and somehow remote felt normal from the start, so some games would seem more natural
