By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Horrorfest on 20 January 2011
Edit Thread
NotStan said:
Horrorfest said:

Why would I get a game that isn't fully featured? With the combination of an exclusive map and timed exclusive DLC, it's a deal breaker for me at the moment unless this ends up being amazing which I doubt........ If It's great, I'll end up getting it down the line but this is the worst way to introduce a new multi-platform IP. Not to mention, the ridiculous line up of games for the PS3 this year. So it's a combination of all of those things. If you have a 360 or you're very interested in Homefront regardless and it's one of your most anticipated games then I would understand why you want this game. imo though, this is a deal breaker through "exclusivity" features and there are far better games to get this year.

Oh my god. Reread that paragraph and realise how vain you are. The f'ing difference is like a month, a month of exclusivity does NOT mean that the game is "not fully featured". Not fully featured would imply that there is a part of the single player campaign missing, or there is a major difference between the different versions. Your point is invalid in this, if you want to be vain in this case, fair enough. I struggle to think of anyone that will share your somewhat rubbish view on things. 

I am actually riled in disbelief over how stupid your argument is, I'd understand it if there was a question of a whole map PACK being exclusive to X360 without any chance of it coming to PS3.

Did you not read my whole post? Why would I care about this when there are much better games to buy this year? Okay so yes my comment of it not being fully featured is incorrect, I admit. But it's the exclusivity that is bullshit and like I previously mentioned, there are much better games coming out this year.