| Horrorfest said: Why would I get a game that isn't fully featured? With the combination of an exclusive map and timed exclusive DLC, it's a deal breaker for me at the moment unless this ends up being amazing which I doubt........ If It's great, I'll end up getting it down the line but this is the worst way to introduce a new multi-platform IP. Not to mention, the ridiculous line up of games for the PS3 this year. So it's a combination of all of those things. If you have a 360 or you're very interested in Homefront regardless and it's one of your most anticipated games then I would understand why you want this game. imo though, this is a deal breaker through "exclusivity" features and there are far better games to get this year. |
Oh my god. Reread that paragraph and realise how vain you are. The f'ing difference is like a month, a month of exclusivity does NOT mean that the game is "not fully featured". Not fully featured would imply that there is a part of the single player campaign missing, or there is a major difference between the different versions. Your point is invalid in this, if you want to be vain in this case, fair enough. I struggle to think of anyone that will share your somewhat rubbish view on things.
I am actually riled in disbelief over how stupid your argument is, I'd understand it if there was a question of a whole map PACK being exclusive to X360 without any chance of it coming to PS3.
Disconnect and self destruct, one bullet a time.
