By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
sapphi_snake on 20 January 2011
Edit Thread
Kasz216 said:
sapphi_snake said:
Kasz216 said:

I... generally don't see the problem.

I don't think it'll help him be reelected, but he's not actually doing anything.

Now if he ends up being biased against non christians this is a good proof.  Or really a good way even if he's fair for people to harass the state for money....

but this has zero to do with seperation of Church and State.

You mean there's nothing wrong with an elected official proselytising?

Why would there be?

Just so long as he doesn't create any legislature or use his powers to bribe people in the process of doing so.

It's no different then an elected official trying to convince you to go to his favorite steak joint.  It's his opinion and he has every right to it.

It's not the place of an elected official to proselytise. This isn't an issue of having an opinion, but one of forcing your opinion on others. His words are very telling of what he'll do in the future,



"I don't understand how someone could like Tolstoy and Dostoyevsky, but not like Twilight!!!"

"Last book I read was Brokeback Mountain, I just don't have the patience for them unless it's softcore porn."

                                                                               (The Voice of a Generation and Seece)

"If you cant stand the sound of your own voice than dont become a singer !!!!!"

                                                                               (pizzahut451)