By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
PearlJam on 19 January 2011
Edit Thread
deskpro2k3 said:
PearlJam said:
pizzahut451 said:
PearlJam said:
pizzahut451 said:
PearlJam said:

PS2 had a DVD drive, while the GameCube used mini-disks that only held 1.5 GB of data. But only an insane person would argue that the PS2 had better graphics.

Let's not forget that the PS3 has a very limited memory architecture, and only 512 MB of Ram. If it had maybe twice the memory of the 360, people making these claims would have a point. You could have GBs worth of data, but you still have to work with the limited RAM.

And with billion times better CPU


Yeah, and the 360 has billion times better GPU and WAY more RAM. A whole 10MB.

Hence why Xbox 360 is playing catch up with PS3 since 2008


It's the other way around.


CPU and SPU > GPU. take a look at some of the ps3 exclusives coming this year.


Dude you don't have to try to convince me, I consider the PS3 a better machine. But it takes a special kind of stupid to say the CPU is a billion times better.

Talk to me when multi-plats are running/looking considerably better on PS3. Several years in and they still generally run/look better on 360. I care more about multi-plats than any exclusives since my gaming library mostly consists of multi-plat games.