Wagram said:
PearlJam said:
pizzahut451 said:
PearlJam said:
pizzahut451 said:
PearlJam said:
PS2 had a DVD drive, while the GameCube used mini-disks that only held 1.5 GB of data. But only an insane person would argue that the PS2 had better graphics.
Let's not forget that the PS3 has a very limited memory architecture, and only 512 MB of Ram. If it had maybe twice the memory of the 360, people making these claims would have a point. You could have GBs worth of data, but you still have to work with the limited RAM.
|
And with billion times better CPU
|
Yeah, and the 360 has billion times better GPU and WAY more RAM. A whole 10MB.
|
Hence why Xbox 360 is playing catch up with PS3 since 2008
|
It's the other way around.
|
Well technically yes the PS3 is playing catch up to catch the 360s sales, but the 360 launched 1 year earlier.
In terms of time though the PS3 is outselling the 360 since launch.
|
Not really sales but in software, online, DLC, non-gaming apps. Pretty much everything. Considering the systems are 1 year apart, the jump in tech is pretty small.
