Acevil said:
ethomaz said:
TRios_Zen said:
ethomaz said:
Acevil said:
Mass Effect 1 events (mostly in the forms of side missions) effect Mass Effect 2 in small ways, but it still adds to the overall game, and make it much better.
|
No. It just a plus and don't make the game best or worst after all... most people I talk said they played without using the first save game.
|
The ability to play the trilogy from begining to end either on the PC or 360 is superior to only being able to play 2 of the 3 games on the PS3...
You aren't really trying to argue otherwise...are you?
|
Yeah... the late port Mass Effect 2 is better on PS3... that's the only fact here.
You want to add Mass Effect 1 to Mass Effect 2 to make it a better game on PC or 360... but that's not change the fact Mass Effect 2 is better on PS3.
I can play Mass Effect 1 on PC (the best version)... and so play Mass Effect 2 on PS3 (the best version). I didn't need to play all trilogy do make a game better... I can just play the best version of Mass Effect 3 (PC?).
So if Uncharted 3 come to PC with better graphics and some new features... the Uncharted 3 on PS3 will be a better game just because it have Uncharted 1 & 2 too? Bullshit... that's just a bad excuse.
|
It would be if Uncharted 1&2 effected 3 in some way. Like the actual Save Data. <.<
You honestly don't seem to understand on save data effects each game.
|
Ok. What ME1 save data change in ME2??? Please, convice me... because all I read and talk until now made me believe that not much changes and the experience is the same without the save.
