By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Squilliam on 17 January 2011
Edit Thread
Euphoria14 said:
Squilliam said:
Euphoria14 said:

 

Look, anyone can sit here and disagree, but facts are facts and they are in fact Playstation Move titles.

If all the PS3 got from 3rd parties for the first couple of years were PS2 ports would you call them PS3 titles?


If they can only be played on a PS3? Yes.

That is like saying that Sly Collection doesn't count.

 

Although I know where you are going here, or least I think I do. If I am correct in my thoughts then that means that all 360/PC titles do not count as 360 exclusives. Which in turn would mean that most would need to agree that LensofTruth and IGN, amongst other sites agreeing that 360 had the stronger exclusive lineup is entirely hogwash.

So if I am right than which is it? 

Do Move/Dualshock 3 titles not count as exclusive titles or did PS3 in fact have the better exclusive lineup for the 3rd year in a row?

It is one or the other, we can't keep making up the rules as the years go by.

In my opinion, just as transferring a DVD onto a Blu Ray disc doesn't make that a Blu Ray movie, transferring Move controls onto a pre-existing game is a little better but I don't consider them to be genuine Move titles. However all titles which share a parallel development or come after Move was released are Move titles regardless of the fact that they are also dual shock titles because they were designed with much greater care and consideration for that control scheme. I don't mind if you disagree here...

I don't care about which you consider to have had the best lineup of games, thats your personal beliefs and I want nothing to do with it. It is a needless argument which cannot be 'won' as it is entirely subjective.



Tease.