Metallicube said:
And what is quality? Clearly games like Just Dance, Carnival Games, and Guitar Hero are quality to many many people; millions in fact. Or are all those people wrong? What we might view as quality isn't necessarilly viewed as such by much of the mainstream. I've yet to see an example of a true quality Wii third party game that deserved success and didn't get it (by success I'm refering to at least platinum). You could argue games like LKS, Red Steel 2, and Mad World, but clearly those games weren't designed to sell to the masses, as they are very niche, have limited appeal, complex control schemes, and in many cases, quite short and not worth the $50 price tag. |
Yes they are wrong, because they play it because they find it fun... It is not because you like fries it is high quality food.. You are defending now the kind of casuals who call games as Super Mario Galaxy 2 crap and sell it at gamestop for 5$ so they can buy just dance 2 with a 5$ reduction;.
Having fun with a game doesnt mean automatically it is high quality in my book, fun is just one of the necessary factors to be called high quality... Addiciting, new (not seen yet) features, blowing you away, great soundtrack etc are some other required features it needs to be high quality in my book... The best high qualiy games are the type of games that you can play ten years after release date and still fall in love with..
