WereKitten on 14 January 2011
| MrT-Tar said: This is assuming Nintendo won't do anything at all |
If I were more wicked than I am, I could fill this with "blah blah, asymmetry of disruption, blah blah". Which would mean that N. being the incumbent would have to out-disrupt the disruptors by going even cheaper, even lighter, even simpler, even less bound to hardware - very hard for them - or face an uphill defensive battle they probably can't win.
But since I don't believe the disruption theories are universal enough to cover for evolution of complex intellectual products such as books, movies or videogames, I won't even pretend to play the part. Still a conundrum for those who do believe in the theory, or at least did when they could call N. the disruptor.
