hunter_alien said:
Boutros said:
No that doesn't make sense.
I don't know if some of you have ever heard or Armond White? He's a movie critic and probably the most controversial one as his taste is simply horrible yet he's still supported by its publication (New York Press). He's been in conflict with many director or other movie critics. Most people dislike him. He's the guy who gave Toy Story 3 a rotten score on rottentomatoes, among many other things.
Jim Sterling is the Armond White of video game journalism. They both are destroying their respective media criticism.
|
So what? IMO many animated movies last year, like The legend of Guardians, where far superior to that hype-driven flick. I would probably rate it the same way. They dont destroy their media criticism, they only give an exterem opinion, and believe it or not, there are plenty out there whom agree with them
So LBP2 got a 7.5, who cares? You dont trust that reviewer, read another one. If something is trully a,mazing it will be reflected in the avrege score.
|
You don't understand.
These peoples have grudge. Their opinion is influenced by irrational reasons.
Toy Story 3 was just one example. 99% of people would disagree with him and with you. Something is wrong.
Now it might happen once that you dislike a movie that is loved by everybody else and it's okay but it's not the case here with Armond White (same thing with Jim Sterling).
Out of the 5 nominees of the Golden Globes for Best Motion Picture, he gave a rotten score to 4 of them. I mean wth?
Being a critic should be a privilege, not a right.
