fps_d0minat0r on 12 January 2011
| Squilliam said: Why would anyone expect anything else? The first game was innovative, exciting, new and a pretty good game on top of that. The second one cannot benefit from being innovative, it's not new anymore and some of the excitement would have worn off. It'd have to be an astronomical game to match the first because it doesn't benefit from it's newness anymore. |
so only innovative games get over 7.5?
ok looks like 99.99% of reviews ever written are wrong.
