noname2200 said:
The problem you have is that you're calling for a man to be held legally responsible for the crimes of others. It is akin to saying that a markmanship instructor should be held liable if any of his students becomes a murderer. That does not fly. Not morally, and certainly not legally.
You're actually providing a better analogy, for my purposes, than I did. The gun distributor in question would not be held liable. In fact, gun manufacturers are NOT held liable for crimes committed with their products. |
1. nope if he made it, kept it to himself and such then that's perfectly fine. No harm no foul. Not the situation here.
2. Nope, unless the gun distributor had a permit to do so, he is breaking the law.

In-Kat-We-Trust Brigade!
"This world is Merciless, and it's also very beautiful"
For All News/Info related to the PlayStation Vita, Come and join us in the Official PSV Thread!







