pizzahut451 said:
Kasz216 said:
About "male superior strength".
What percentage of people in the army do you think are stronger then her...
Averages are just that... averages. Just because your group on average is stronger then another doesn't mean there are a lot of people stronger then you in the other group.
Also that's what boot camp is for. If you pass bootcamp you are fit for combat.
Saying women shouldn't be in the army because men are stronger is like saying that men shouldn't go to college because women are more likely to graduate by 22.
Also, the majority of weapons used in antiquity actually weren't that heavy. Even in europe there were times woman fought and often as well as men. Usually in nomadic tribes like the Goths and Huns and such, and you pretty much needed to as nomads you were often running into soldiers.
Keep in mind, most people in armies had nothing but simple weapons and were lucky to have padded cloth armour.
|
So should i post a picture of high profile male body builder that can rip that ''woman'' in the picture in shreds ?
Nah, you have the ability to argue for over months about 1 argument, so i'll just cut it here and save us some time.
|
Such a picture would be irrelevent.
Said woman is stronger then the average man, and to take it one step further, actually stronger then the average soldier.
If women can be equal too or stronger then the average soldier, logic only dictates they should be allowed to be soldiers. That is what bootcamp is for afterall. Anyone who isn't fit to be in the military, men or women, gay or straight will be expelled or put in a non-combat role.
