By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
highwaystar101 said:
sapphi_snake said:
HappySqurriel said:

If you notice, most of these images take place in television studios where people are often lit from several different directions to eliminate shadows; and this can result in multiple specular highlights (shiny white spots) being put onto glossy objects (like a person's eyes). Depending on the position of the camera, the lights, and the person being shot it is entirely possible to create specular highlights that would give a person's eyes the appearance of being slit eyes; especially if you were recording a low quality image.

Dude, don't bother. You're straining your fingers for nothing.

Thing is, it is worth it in the end.

If not for OoSnap, then others. If someone is saying something to people on a public forum that you know is wrong, then you should let people know that you think that person is wrong and not just remain quiet, just because you think it's not worth it to correct them. If this were the case then incorrect theories will just run rampant.

I do agree though, sometimes it can be a little tiresome endlessly repeating something when you think no one will listen.

While this may be true in some situations, let's be honest now. Someone who'd actually believe OoSnap's theories is obviously beyond help.



"I don't understand how someone could like Tolstoy and Dostoyevsky, but not like Twilight!!!"

"Last book I read was Brokeback Mountain, I just don't have the patience for them unless it's softcore porn."

                                                                               (The Voice of a Generation and Seece)

"If you cant stand the sound of your own voice than dont become a singer !!!!!"

                                                                               (pizzahut451)