Democratic congresswoman shot in Arizona.

[Kasz216]

axt113 said:

Mr Khan said:

Kasz216 said:

axt113 said:

dsister said:

axt113 said:

He had ties to a conservative anti immigration group, American Renaissance

"possibly linked"=/= ties ;_;

It wasn't even said by DHS the statement was made by local law enforcement.

So they still have more evidence than we do, and being possibly inked means you may have ties to the goup,  that fits in with him being a fan of Mein Kampf and therefore definely on the right wing

Have you seen the youtube videos, or note he also likes the communist manifesto (extreme left wing.)

Hence you know, just crazy person politically.

 

Being anti-immigration doesn't make you "right wing."

You know who else is anti immigration and by your definition "right wing".  Gabrielle Giffords.  (That's the senator who was shot, and the target of the shooting, incase you didn't know..)

She kept pushing Obama to deploy the national guard on the border.  Hell, that's why the two irresponsible reasons thrown up for why she was shot was the tea party and mexican drug lorgs.

Mexican drug lords don't want most democrats out of power.

Communism birthed fascism and nazism. National Socialism and all, and all share a common root of necessary violent destruction of the existing order (except for fascism, though certain elements also need to be destroyed for fascism to work)

 Facism was created as a rejection of Marxism, much like neocons were created as a rejection of liberalism, if you see what Hitler said, he sought the destruction of marxism, also fascism is a corporatist economic situation, very different from the marxist ideal.

Contrary to what the right wing wants to propogate, the marxist ideal and fascism are nothing alike, the end point of marxism is the lack of need for any real form of government, even in its earlier stages it was much more intended to be a socialist democracy than a dictatorship.

Have you actually read the communist manifesto or any of Marx's letters?  They show a pretty clear nessesity for complete resocialization of EVERYBODY including the proletariat.  This kind of thing can only happen through violent dictatorship or very very slowly through democracy. 

Except Marx didn't believe communism and socialism could work through democracy due to the corruptability of the higher classes money.  If Marx was alive now, he'd have a heart attack at how could the proeltariat has things.

He'd be completely dumbfounded how far things have progressed since he lived.   Marx held zero faith in any nearly any politician, let alone the ability of a group of them.  When the Paris Commune fell he attributed it to the loss of their leader who was imprisoned, figuring he could be the strong one to lead them to communism... and the vacuum of a leader is what killed them.

A social democracy path to communism is nothing but a revision of Marxism based on the very real positive changes that had occured through the system and a look of what happens when you go outside the system and give power to who you expect to lead you to the promise land.

 

The large difference as far as communist manifesto era communism was concerned is what they were molding them towards.  For Facism, it was the end game... what was good for the state must be good for the people.  For communism it was to mold things until people were ready to live equally with everyone.