By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
ManusJustus said:
Kasz216 said:

That's Manus... is proven without a shadow of a doubt wrong then clings on to one very specific line without paying any attention to any of the context.

He's about 2 posts away from calling you ignorant, unable to change your thought and leaving the thread thinking it will let him perserve some dignity.  (or even worse, somehow think he's right even though the entire burden of proof is against him.)

Probably while mentioning he's a republican.

A republican who is liberal economics wise, in foreign policy and social matters.

Reminds me of my Democratic friend who's homophobic, kind of religiously intolerant and thinks WW3 is brewing with the Middle East...

Been a while since I've beat Kasz down in an intellectual argument.  It appears that he hasn't forgot, and that the whipping was bad enough to hold a grudge.

I'll keep it calm though, atleast until the NFL Prediction League is over so I don't blow my lead :)

riiiiiight.

I believe the last "arguement" we had involved me posting many many historians and scients views about how Galieo was persecuted for attacking the pope and poor science and not his actual views, since scientificically his premise was actually demonstraitably wrong experiments wise until the development of stronger telescopes many many years later, and the fact that Copernicus theories were taught everywhere for about 40-50 years until his trial.  After which it was banned.  Probably due to the fact that his science actually was wrong.  His main proof that the earth revolves around the sun being that there is only one high tide. (When anyone could tell you there were two high tides, everywhere.)

And your response was basically "Nu-uh, this one line in his conviction says it was for teaching helicoentrism."  As if there has never been a case for someone being convicted for something for show when the reason for them being convicted was clearly something else and then left the thread in embaressment.

It's just an old and predictable patern.  The scary thing is, unlike Numonex... I'm pretty sure your trying to be serious with half this stuff.