dsister said:
Baalzamon said:
dsister said:
Chibi.V.29 said:
Yh a nice $100 feature the 360 doesnt have anyway ;) u cna play online and download 99% of the stuff ont eh store without getting plus lol.
|
That's not even the point.
1. I don't care about the 360. I still have everything and more that was promised me when I bought it. Unlike the PS3.
2. Several people in the thread stated that MS doesn't charge publishers because they are charging their customers, guess what, Sony is too.
3.Yo mom!
4. The only difference between the slim and fat at the time of my purchase was the $100 price tag and OtherOS. To get on PSN I have to give it up. So yeah...
|
Sony isn't though. Microsoft is charging customers for key features of games such as playing online at all. Sony is providing a service (PSN Plus) that is completely and totally different than Xbox Live. It has nothing to do with playing online whatsoever. PSN Plus has to do with those who like PSN games can get a bunch of them rented (as long as they keep their subscription), along with discounts, for an extremely cheap price.
|
Sony is though. That's the point. I don't care what the money they are charging their customers is going to. The fact remains they are still charging their customers and publishers.
|
I don't even know why I'm arguing with you. Sony has a service that is like $50 for a year that provides games, it has absolutely nothing to do with online play. People are paying $50 for games, as games cost money. Xbox live is a service that costs like $50 a year for online services, such as playing games online, timed exclusives for games, and all sorts of other goodies. It is a lot more online related. The money going in for Sony is a completely different source of money, and should have nothing to do with whether they charge publishers or not for dlc.
