Invisible PS3 SSFIV costumes explained

[jarrod]

elmooer said:

jarrod said:

KylieDog said:

jarrod said:

KylieDog said:

...Capcom must just be incredibly tight/cheap.

Actually, it's Sony that's incredibly tight/cheap.  Neither Nintendo or Microsoft charge the publisher for free downloads, why should Sony?

 

Nintendo doesn't do DLC except on 42MB limit games.  Whoo I bet those costs are high.  Microsoft charges its playerbase instead.

Eh, Nintendo does DLC on retail games too.  Even paid DLC like in Tales of Graces (costume packs just like... well, SSF4).  Remember that whole "research" thing? ;)

Sony's scamming pubs, charging them for services that are free on competitor's platform.  All there is to it, but at least direct your bitching properly.

So by that logic, Microsoft are scamming people because they are charging to play online when the PS3 is free?

I wouldn't disagree.  Charging for P2P is shameful, but that's not what the thread's about.  It's about Sony's penny pinching, and Capcom's response.