@Farmageddon:
My point is that what people can do is not as important for deciding between having or not having an army as what people actually will do.
How can you determine what a person will do before he/she does it? You really can't. As long as something is a possibility, there's hope.
I'm telling you, yes, you should do something. But you should plan your actions based on the world they will be made on, not the world you hope them to eventually achieve.
But that's counter-productive , and in the end will lead to nothing. Anyways, it's not like I have some big master plan to change the world (and I most likely won't be able to come up with one). If anything, I'll at least try to be how I see people should be, and not become corrupted by what people are.
Sure, nothing to disagree there. But sometimes ypu do have to deal with fire, you don't always have (or know you have) a better option.
In the case of war people (on either sides) choose the worst one. And as khasz pointed out, not all people who agree with war consider it to be a necessity.
"I don't understand how someone could like Tolstoy and Dostoyevsky, but not like Twilight!!!"
"Last book I read was Brokeback Mountain, I just don't have the patience for them unless it's softcore porn."
(The Voice of a Generation and Seece)
"If you cant stand the sound of your own voice than dont become a singer !!!!!"
(pizzahut451)







