HappySqurriel said:
While the world on the whole may be better off without war, historically many individuals and nations have seen massive benefits from being highly aggressive; and it has only been in the last half century (or so) where the world banding together to counter aggression has made this strategy less successful. Only when being the aggressor becomes a "losing" strategy (when the costs involved greatly outweigh the potential gains) for every nation can the world truly achieve peace; and this can only be obtained if everyone has a viable military and is willing to interfere to preserve peace. |
I agree. I mean, the reason all this is part of human nature, ingrained in our genes, is precisely that it has actually worked well in the past.







