Boutros said:
Khuutra said:
You backed off of a factually incorrect statement into another factually incorrect statement.
It is impossible for qualitative judgments for a subjective medium to be true or false, therefore his statement is by no means indefensible. You're free to disagree with him and even argue about it, but trying to claim that you're supported by facts is a verifiable falsehood.
|
Okay but let's just say that I provided more proofs than he did. I'm actually trying to make it into something that isn't my opinion by providing facts. I don't quite know what else I should do...
I still don't understand how the links I gave aren't valid...?
|
Other people having an opinion does not invalidate his, is the point.