HappySqurriel said:
When you eliminate the 25% of 33% most extreme individuals from either party, you will find that most conservatives come to their political ideals through a logical argument while most progressive individuals come to their political ideals through an emotional argument. What this tends to mean is that a moderate progressive is far more likely to see an opposing political ideal as being reprehensible, and as being indicative of a character flaw. Being that many moderate conservatives have made the mistake of arguing with a progressive in the past (and had to deal with the consequences) they may just "bite their tongue" in social situations to avoid an unnecessary argument. |
Do you have any data on that claim or is it just a personal observation? The big difference between Republicans and Democrats comes down to the proper role of the state in relation to citizens. If you really look at most issues, they originate with the problem of government power. The big question is, "What roles can the government perform better than its citizens?" The fundamental ideals of both parties are not arrived at through emotional arguments. It comes about largely because of a different conception of how society functions. In other words, you could say they ground their arguments with different claims. Now on moral issues, emotional arguments are more prevalent, but this is true for both Republicans and Democrats.







